“I forgive you” (153).
Excuse me?
[context: Miller talks here about forgiving his father whom he has not seen in 30 years and who has been largely absent from his life]
Agree or disagree with me, but forgiveness is not something that just happens within a few seconds, in my opinion. Sure, at an earlier point in the book Miller comments that he forgives his father because he does not even really know what to forgive him for. But if he were completely indifferent about his father he would not have taken so much time to find him, nor would this act of looking for him have been such a large challenge.
I don’t know. Maybe for some forgiveness is this easy, just saying “I forgive you” and voila.
For me reading this one simple sentence however was rather upsetting and I thought that it sounded too simple in the context of the rest of the story.
“Part of our selves is spirit” (153).
Yes. Much of ourselves is spirit, soul, aura. Something like that.
“It was good pursuing a girl” (154).
No no no. Why do you have to pursue a girl? Why objectify women in that way? Pursue a relationship, sure. Pursue the love of your life. Pursuing means there is an object to be pursued – women are not objects.
“The more difficult, the better the story” (156).
YES. It’s better, but also harder. But through harder stories you’ll (we will) also grow more.
“If I hadn’t done to Peru, nobody would have died. And if I hadn’t seen my father, the fate of thousands would not have been affected” (157).
Ok. That’s exaggerated thinking. Yes, Miller here is talking about what makes a story epic. But if you are basing everything off of whether the life of other’s would otherwise be in danger or not you are missing an important aspect of life: that it’s about growth, not about all of a sudden doing something glorious that saves life's every day. That really is the material that movies and superhero novels are made of.
I think the question should much rather be how to live a life that inspires the lives of others and impacts others positively? Will my actions today make another person smile?
And sometimes it is just important to realize that you yourself might die—metaphorically speaking—in the absence of an experience like going to Peru and challenging oneself. Because without such experiences we do stay stuck in our routine, in the comfort zone.
Talking about Bob Goff and his wisdom, Miller cites that Bob said “[I don’t think] we should be afraid to embrace whimsy…that nagging idea that life could be magical; it could be special if we were only willing to take a few risks” (167)
First of all, I want to be Bob. He sent out letters to world leaders and asked them for interviews and then said they were always welcome at his house. He makes (unofficial) peace contracts and asks for diplomacy. And I absolutely agree with his words. Let's all embrace whimsy.
“You can either get bitter, or better. I chose to get better. It’s made all the difference,” said one of Donald’s friends (181).
Let’s all get better. That doesn’t mean that it takes more energy and strength than all of us think we have. That doesn’t mean that it’ll just be a walk in the park or that it won’t take time. But it does meant that the alternative is to get bitter, and I really do think that that is true, that one internalizes all the shit that goes on in the world and become cynical and give up hope that there are still good people out there and good moments to be lived.
Becoming better (whether that meant to recover and revive, or simply become a better person, become even more amazing), does not disregard the problems that we face—it simply means not giving in to problems and giving up before the start, giving in and becoming (or staying) passive. Becoming better means to face challenges with courage.
Victor Frankl states that “life, even amid the absurdity of human suffering, still has meaning” (196). I really want to read Frankel’s book. He was a psychologist who survived the holocaust. “Life is a persuade of meaning itself, and … search for meaning provides the basis for a person’s motivation,” writes Frankl, and I agree (196).
“When you stop expecting people to be perfect, you can like them for who they are” (206).
Yes that is true, I think. I think that making an effort to stop looking for perfection and, in turn, cherish humanity and uniqueness in everyone you meet is essential to forming a better community.
“The most human of human beings within twenty miles was sitting across from me” (223).
No, no. However “human” the person was in the moment, this statement disregards the humanity of every other person within that twenty-mile-radius. We are all the most human of human beings if we let ourselves be. It might be easier for some to open up and show feelings than for others, but that in itself does not make them less human.
“It wasn’t necessary to win for the story to be great, it was only necessary to sacrifice everything” (231).
Give it your best. Then, mo matter what the outcome might be, there is something you can say; that you have given your honest best. That’s what my mom taught me.
“I know there are biochemical causes for some forms of depressions, but I wish people who struggle against dark thoughts would risk their hoes on living a good story” (247).
While there is a grain of truth to this statement—that it would be great for everyone to take risks to live more meaningful lives, the issue is that people with depression do not have the energy to take such risks, or feel that it doesn’t make a difference, and that it is incredibly hard to break out of such a cycle of thoughts. This makes a statement like the one above meaningless, since it disregards the difficulty of depression.
I was quite unhappy with the end of this book. It was rather uninspiring. It also bothered me that Miller states that he wrote the book in a rush. It makes the (inspiring) things he wrote feel less meaningless and written without meaning. Maybe I am too critical.
What do you think?